Transform your prompts from guesswork to precision. The AI Prompt Assistant is a floating toolbox that analyzes your prompts in real-time, classifies them into 14 specialized categories, and recommends the optimal ensemble configuration—complete with strategy, models, rounds, and arbiter selection.
Whether you're crafting a business strategy, debugging code, or writing creative content, the Assistant helps you:
The Prompt Assistant uses an intelligent multi-agent system to analyze and optimize your queries:
[!NOTE] The assistant uses OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small model to securely vectorize and classify your prompt. The Confidence Score represents the semantic similarity to our known category archetypes – a score of ~70% is a very strong match!
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Creative Content | Stories, poetry, creative writing, artistic content |
| Business Strategy | Business plans, market analysis, strategic decisions |
| Marketing | Ad copy, campaigns, brand messaging, social media |
| Technical/Coding | Programming, debugging, architecture, implementation |
| Technical Writing | Documentation, API docs, guides, manuals |
| Research & Analysis | Deep dives, comparisons, evaluations, studies |
| Educational | Tutorials, explanations, learning materials |
| Decision Support | Pros/cons analysis, trade-offs, recommendations |
| Problem Solving | Troubleshooting, debugging, optimization |
| Communication | Emails, presentations, proposals, pitches |
| Content Strategy | SEO planning, editorial calendars, content frameworks |
| Product Development | Feature specs, user stories, PRDs |
| Legal & Compliance | Legal analysis, contracts, regulatory review |
| Data Science | Data analysis, ML models, statistical analysis |
Along with category classification, the assistant evaluates prompt complexity:
The assistant analyzes your prompt for improvement opportunities and offers actionable enhancements you can toggle on/off:
Based on your prompt's category and complexity, the assistant recommends an optimal ensemble strategy with clear reasoning:
The assistant selects models optimized for your task, with configurable priorities:
For strategies requiring synthesis, the assistant recommends an independent arbiter model that:
The AI Prompt Assistant appears as a floating toolbox window that doesn't block your main workspace. Access it by:
Cmd+A (Mac) or Ctrl+A (Windows) to instantly toggle the window.The toolbox remains open while you work on your prompt and can be dragged anywhere on your screen.
The floating toolbox has a clean, single-panel design with three main sections:
Shows real-time analysis of your prompt:
Displays recommended configuration in two expandable cards:
Strategy Card:
Models Card:
We're considering expanding into the European market with our B2B SaaS
platform. Should we establish a regional office or work remotely?

Analysis Results:
Strategy Recommendation:
Models: Gemini 2.5 Flash, GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5 Arbiter: Claude Opus 4.5
You check the suggestions and decide to add more context:
Assistant Suggestions:
Improved Prompt:
Create a **B2B** SaaS GTM strategy for a **Series A startup targeting mid-market European fintech companies**.
The strategy should include a **6-month roadmap**, **budget allocation for a $50k marketing spend**, and key performance indicators.
Focus on content marketing and partnership channels.
Why this is better: The improved prompt directly answers the assistant's clarification questions, transforming a generic request into a fully specified strategic brief. This allows the Collaborative Synthesis strategy to:
[!NOTE] Still seeing suggestions? The assistant is designed to push for perfection. Even with a great prompt, it might suggest adding a polite closing ("please") or specifying the exact output format (e.g., "Report", "Table") to ensure the best possible result.

The assistant updates recommendations based on your enhanced prompt, potentially suggesting more rounds or different models for the added complexity.
Click Apply in the header. The assistant:
You're ready to run your ensemble query!
Every recommendation includes 2-3 alternative strategies. Click the strategy dropdown to view:
Example dropdown:
✓ Collaborative Synthesis
synthesis of diverse perspectives
Trade-off: Fast but may miss edge cases
Expert Panel
Maximum diversity of viewpoints
Trade-off: Higher cost, longer runtime
Debate Tournament
Best for structured argument analysis
Trade-off: Takes longer but provides balanced perspectives
Click any alternative to instantly switch strategies. The models, rounds, and cost estimates update automatically.
[!TIP] Why didn't the strategy change? Adding context (like the "Refining Your Approach" step above) strengthens the Category match but rarely changes it. Since Strategy is derived from Category, making a Business prompt more detailed just confirms it's a Business prompt, keeping the strategy consistent. This particular "stickiness" ensures stable workflows.
The priority selector dramatically changes model recommendations:
Goal: Results in under 30 seconds Typical models: Gemini Flash, GPT-4o Mini, Claude Haiku Cost range: $0.02 - $0.06 Best for: Quick tasks, iterations, brainstorming, simple queries
Goal: Minimize token cost while maintaining quality Typical models: Mix of efficient mid-tier models Cost range: $0.05 - $0.10 Best for: High-volume usage, budget constraints, moderate complexity
Goal: Best possible results regardless of cost Typical models: Claude Opus, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, DeepSeek Reasoner Cost range: $0.15 - $0.40 Best for: Important decisions, complex analysis, creative projects
Goal: Optimal mix of speed, cost, and quality Typical models: Claude Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro, DeepSeek Chat Cost range: $0.08 - $0.18 Best for: Most use cases, good default choice
Control which models are included based on geographic origin:
Includes: All available models Benefit: Maximum diversity of perspectives and capabilities Example set: Claude Sonnet, GPT-4o, DeepSeek, Qwen, Gemini Pro
Includes: Anthropic (Claude), OpenAI (GPT), Google (Gemini) Benefit: Western perspectives, US data residency Example set: Claude Sonnet, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro Use when: Regulatory requirements, data sensitivity, cultural context
Includes: DeepSeek, Qwen, other Chinese providers Benefit: Chinese perspectives, often more cost-effective Example set: DeepSeek Chat, DeepSeek Reasoner, Qwen-Max, Qwen-Plus Use when: Asia market focus, Chinese language, budget optimization
Includes: Top models from each major region/provider Benefit: Balanced perspective and risk mitigation Example set: 1x OpenAI, 1x Anthropic, 1x Google, 1x DeepSeek
Even rough prompts help, but clarity improves recommendations. Specific prompts get higher confidence classifications and better-matched strategies.
When the assistant offers enhancement suggestions:
Don't default to "Balanced" for everything. The cost difference between Speed and Quality can be 5-8x, so choose appropriately for your needs.
The complexity indicator guides round counts:
More rounds = higher cost but better results for complex tasks.